L33T
05-24-2007, 11:14 PM
I'm trying to decide between these two choices:
1. Coralife Aqualight 20" 28W
Model Coralife Aqualight
Lighting Power 28W
Moonlighting? NO
Dimensions 20 x 5 x 2.5
Total Cost: 52.06
- Price of Light: 39.95
- Price of Mounts: 6.95
- Discount on Price: -2.345
- Shipping: 7.5
- Reference Store: HELLOLIGHTS
2. Current Satellite 20" 40W
Current Satellite
Total Cost: 64.69
- Price of Light: 55.19
- Price of Mounts: 7.99
- Discount on Price: -9.477
- Shipping: 10.99
- Reference Store: drsfostersmith
I'll be keeping the following:
- (flat) Mushrooms (without stingers on the outside)
- Scarlet Reef Hermit Crab
- Pulsing Xenia
- Yellow Polyps
- Finger Leather
- Dwarf Seahorses
- Linckia Sea Star, Blue
- Purple Monti Cap, &c
According to tons of research I've done with some cross referencing, all of those items are safe with seahorses (only the yellow polyps I can't seem to find information regarding compatibility with seahorses).
I'd like to keep the option of getting other corals open, however. At the same time, I realize that simply getting something extreme is self-defeating, as it will not only cause the temperature of the water to rise uncontrollably, but will also not be good for the mushrooms. Also, better lighting is expensive.
Finally, I'd like to keep the option of upgrading from a 5.5g to a 10g aquarium. Both lights will fit both aquariums.
It seems that both lights have their pros/cons. The Aqualight looks to be higher quality overall, and sturdier, with its metallic body, whereas the Satellite fails to share that same aesthetic appeal. Of course, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
On the other hand, the Satellite has a higher power output at 40W instead of 28W. For a 5.5g, the Aqualight has an output of 5.09W/g, whereas the Satellite outputs 7.27W/g. If I were to upgrade to a 10g however, the Aqualight would output 2.8W/g as opposed to 4W/g from the Satellite. At the same time, power per volume isn't quite so important for small tanks such as a 5.5g or 10g; it is the total power per-se that matters most, according to some. From that perspective, 28W seems sufficient for the corals I picked, though I am not sure for the case of a 10g aquarium. 40W seems definitely sufficient for either scenario.
The Satellite does come with the cool feature of a moonlight; if I were to get a moonlight for the Aqualight, it might cost about $15, which would even the cost difference between the two models.
Given these considerations, which of the two lights would you recommend?
1. Coralife Aqualight 20" 28W
Model Coralife Aqualight
Lighting Power 28W
Moonlighting? NO
Dimensions 20 x 5 x 2.5
Total Cost: 52.06
- Price of Light: 39.95
- Price of Mounts: 6.95
- Discount on Price: -2.345
- Shipping: 7.5
- Reference Store: HELLOLIGHTS
2. Current Satellite 20" 40W
Current Satellite
Total Cost: 64.69
- Price of Light: 55.19
- Price of Mounts: 7.99
- Discount on Price: -9.477
- Shipping: 10.99
- Reference Store: drsfostersmith
I'll be keeping the following:
- (flat) Mushrooms (without stingers on the outside)
- Scarlet Reef Hermit Crab
- Pulsing Xenia
- Yellow Polyps
- Finger Leather
- Dwarf Seahorses
- Linckia Sea Star, Blue
- Purple Monti Cap, &c
According to tons of research I've done with some cross referencing, all of those items are safe with seahorses (only the yellow polyps I can't seem to find information regarding compatibility with seahorses).
I'd like to keep the option of getting other corals open, however. At the same time, I realize that simply getting something extreme is self-defeating, as it will not only cause the temperature of the water to rise uncontrollably, but will also not be good for the mushrooms. Also, better lighting is expensive.
Finally, I'd like to keep the option of upgrading from a 5.5g to a 10g aquarium. Both lights will fit both aquariums.
It seems that both lights have their pros/cons. The Aqualight looks to be higher quality overall, and sturdier, with its metallic body, whereas the Satellite fails to share that same aesthetic appeal. Of course, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
On the other hand, the Satellite has a higher power output at 40W instead of 28W. For a 5.5g, the Aqualight has an output of 5.09W/g, whereas the Satellite outputs 7.27W/g. If I were to upgrade to a 10g however, the Aqualight would output 2.8W/g as opposed to 4W/g from the Satellite. At the same time, power per volume isn't quite so important for small tanks such as a 5.5g or 10g; it is the total power per-se that matters most, according to some. From that perspective, 28W seems sufficient for the corals I picked, though I am not sure for the case of a 10g aquarium. 40W seems definitely sufficient for either scenario.
The Satellite does come with the cool feature of a moonlight; if I were to get a moonlight for the Aqualight, it might cost about $15, which would even the cost difference between the two models.
Given these considerations, which of the two lights would you recommend?