Kenny B
Reefbikeer
After recently upgrading to my new 90g, it'd been about 7 years or so since I've had to brainstorm about my lighting specs.
I've been using a 4X 96w PLL which is on loan ,just to get me through the cycling and to get by the initial new tank syndrome algaes.
My last large system,which was a 135g tank which was a mix of LPS, SPS, and softies. After being bitten by the SPS bug I started running 3 400w Iwasaki 6500K's with 4 VHO actinic 03's.
Now in my new 90g I'm in the debating whether or not to go with the 400w
10k,s or the Iwasaki 6500k's with just 2 VHO actinic 03's.
In the past the Iwasakis performed exceptionally well. Is there any advantage/disadvantage to using the 400w 10k bulbs with the actinic 03's with regards to growth rates and color rendition?
Opinions welcome.
Thanks in advance, Ken
I've been using a 4X 96w PLL which is on loan ,just to get me through the cycling and to get by the initial new tank syndrome algaes.
My last large system,which was a 135g tank which was a mix of LPS, SPS, and softies. After being bitten by the SPS bug I started running 3 400w Iwasaki 6500K's with 4 VHO actinic 03's.
Now in my new 90g I'm in the debating whether or not to go with the 400w
10k,s or the Iwasaki 6500k's with just 2 VHO actinic 03's.
In the past the Iwasakis performed exceptionally well. Is there any advantage/disadvantage to using the 400w 10k bulbs with the actinic 03's with regards to growth rates and color rendition?
Opinions welcome.
Thanks in advance, Ken