JonsReef
Non-member
Actually, if I recall dong is a scientist of some sort. He is quite knowledgeable. I would trust him. It isn't just the 2 of them. There are countless threads on RC with the same issue.
I'm not doubting dong's credentials or intelligence, but rather his hasty logic in this circumstance only. If he is truly trained as a scientist, he'd be the first to admit that an observation is the basis for an experiment but by no means conclusive evidence of a phenomenon.
It seems silly to me to keep comparing the different lighting technologies in such an observational and unscientific way. If I bought a car and it just so happened to break down, would it make sense to assume that ALL cars were faulty and that I should just switch to talking the train all the time because everyone said trains were more reliable? Nonsense.
There are many many posts about difficulties with MH and T5 lighting as well. Until someone can adequately control for all other variables/parameters and truly compare LED vs. T5 vs. MH, all of our advice and suggestions are merely anecdotal at best.
Last edited: