I wasnt thinking of stoping them, but instead of being a member, maybe making them pay to be a sponser? I just dont understand why some LFS have to pay for that benefit, and other dont? That way members could leave remarks in the Vendors Forum, of thier "First Hand Exp", instead of being accused of calling members out on unethical practices. Your right I will leave it at that. I just wanted to make a point, because I felt it was a dicussion about naming/ethics, and felt for me this is a big part of it.
Remember everyone serves a purpose in the group. Non paid members sell to and buy from BRS members. Paid Members get a larger audience to sell to and get good deals from non member(not 100% but you get the idea). Non members also help build the sites content. Many of these non paid members have other base groups they pay to be in, but choose to share in our experience. Also they will not sign up to be sponsors they will to go to another venue where they can sell things for free.
LFS sell wholesale. Members/non members are allowed to sell aquacultured livestock and old equipment. This is based around the groups charter. So making members, any sort, pay for sponsorship would not be foster our group charter.
Last edited: