so it gets hard to have a discussion about treatment/eradication without it turning into a debate about treatment vs immunity.
I guess I called that one, ay?
There is no question, and for many years there has been no question, BOTH healthy fish can generally live with / fight off ick, AND at the same time it is possible to eradicate ick and keep it out of a given system. One truth does not negate the other.
Treatment takes a bunch of time and effort, and as was being discussed there are some uncertainties, particularly how long of a fallow period will actually be needed to clear an infected system. It's also true that a lot of fish have been lost in the effort to treat them for ick (often due to mistakes, but also plenty of times where the fish is very sick going into treatment, or where otherwise the fish didn't make it through). We do know for a fact that ick can be eradicated if the fish are treated properly AND the tank left fallow for long enough (whatever that ends up being).
Management / immunity / living with ick as also a valid approach. It's certainly easier, but you are left with the risk that some stressor can cause flare ups down the road. One man's "ticking time bomb" is another's miracle of natural immunity.
To the OP/gsxkid, I agree, don't give up. Sadly you were misinformed on the fallow time needed. I can only speculate on where that came from, but I can say that I have followed countless discussions about ick treatment and my observation is that nearly every time what starts as a discussion on treatment, quickly turns into mixed advice about treatment vs management, and then mixed advice about things like necessary time lines. Pretty soon anyone reading is left confused and having no idea who to listen to. Often in the end this process leads to misinformation, bad (or at least indecipherable) advice, and fish staying sick and or dying. We do know that 10-12 weeks is the bare minimum that is likely to be successful for a fallow period (yet nearly every time I post that someone follows with "6 weeks should be fine"). We should be telling people 16 weeks is the minimum, that way the advice would be reasonably accurate most of the time.
To anyone following and or posting - please try to be clear on this stuff. Yes, Dong and many others have mature and thriving systems, not overstocked with fish, that can provide fish with a very good chance of long term survival and success even with Ick present. BUT, to a newer reefer with a newer system, less stable system, somewhat heavily stocked fish load, particularly vulnerable fish, or just plain bad luck - "just feed them well" is far less likely to lead to good outcomes.
gsxkid, If you try to do this again, I would suggest using the tank transfer method over copper. It's much more gentle on the fish but is still quite effective. That and of course go much longer on the fallow time. Otherwise, as most people in your shoes would do at this point, give management a shot. You are dealing with a fish that's known for being an "ick magnet", but just the same it is possible that it will shake this. (how big is your system? How old? Other fish?) I certainly wouldn't blame you for feeling less than confident in treatment after this experience.